Family Law

children, siblings, brother-817365.jpg

How do I change a Minnesota child custody order?

In Minnesota, Minnesota Statute Section 518.18 provides the law for changing a child custody order. The easiest way to modify a child custody order is by agreement. In other words, if both parents agree to change custody, it is going to be much easier to get an order from the Court that changes custody. Many times, though, parties are not in agreement about modifying custody. If that is the case, then you will need to bring a motion to change custody. You have to have a statutory basis for bring your motion. Two examples of a statutory reason to bring a motion to modify custody include: (1)  denial of or interference with parenting time; or (2) physical or emotional endangerment to the child. A party also must show that the modification is necessary to serve the best interests of the child. The process of trying to change a child custody order can be very slow and expensive. Although emergency orders may be issued in some cases, many cases take between six months to a year to be resolved. When you believe your child is endangered, the wait can be agonizing. In some cases, parents may try to contact Child Protective Services in order to report the abuse. Elizabeth Rosar Chermack is a Minnesota Family Law Attorney.  Call (952) 491-0390 or send an email to liz@chermacklaw.com to schedule a consultation with Liz. ATTORNEY ADVERTISING MATERIAL. The content of this website is for informational purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No attorney/client relationship is formed by use of this website. Do not submit confidential information via this site unless and until there is a signed retainer contract on file.

How do I change a Minnesota child custody order? Read More »

Changing custody or parenting time when both parents agree

If both parents agree that changing custody and/or parenting time is in the child’s best interest, then the parents will want to formalize that agreement and submit it to the Court for the Judge to sign and enter as an Order. This formal document is a “Stipulation and Order.” Sometimes parents might not think it’s necessary to go through that process. They might not think that they need the Court to be involved. They might not want to spend the money to have a document drafted and submitted to the Court. In my experience, though, it is best to formalize the new agreements and have them approved by the Court. This is because even though the parents might be getting along great right now and they agree to the changes now, if that co-parenting relationship changes and a parent changes their mind, the informal agreements are not an Order and are not enforceable. In my law practice, I will typically charge a lower flat fee to draft and submit a Stipulation and Order to Modify Custody and/or Parenting time if there is an agreement. Getting your agreements formalized so you have an enforceable order (and remember that enforceable orders typically lead to stability for children which is in their best interest) does not have to be an expensive undertaking. Elizabeth Rosar Chermack is a Burnsville lawyer, and can represent you in your change of custody and parenting time matter.  Call (952) 491-0390 or send an email to liz@chermacklaw.com to schedule a consultation with Liz. ATTORNEY ADVERTISING MATERIAL. The content of this website is for informational purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No attorney/client relationship is formed by use of this website. Do not submit confidential information via this site unless and until there is a signed retainer contract on file.

Changing custody or parenting time when both parents agree Read More »

study, lawyer, right-2746004.jpg

What if you can’t reach a divorce agreement?

In a previous post, I talked about getting divorced in Minnesota when you and your spouse are in agreement on all terms of your divorce. If you aren’t able to reach an agreement, then you are likely going to have a contested divorce. That does not mean that you have to be in court forever. It also doesn’t prevent you from eventually reaching a divorce settlement. The family court system in Minnesota is set up to encourage parties to try to reach an agreement. Parties can file for divorce without being in agreement as to how to resolve the divorce. You will still be given ample opportunity to negotiate a divorce settlement. For example, at your first court date after filing a contested divorce, you will have an opportunity to opt-in to Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE). If you are not able to reach a settlement at ENE, you may have a pre-trial or a temporary hearing. Eventually, if you and your spouse are not able to reach an agreement on all issues, you may end up going to trial and asking the Judge to decide those contested issues for you. As an attorney, I do not “churn” my clients’ cases for fees. If a client wants to proceed in a certain manner in their case, I do my best to let them know the possible costs of doing so: both the financial costs and the “real life” costs. Sometimes the only way for a case to resolve is by going to trial; for example, if the opposing party is not being honest, safe, or willing to comprise. However, going to trial is not typically what is best for families. It is expensive, and it leads to animosity and finger-pointing between the parties. When children are involved, it’s important to remember that you will still need to co-parent with this person even after the trial is over and the divorce is final.   Elizabeth Rosar Chermack, Attorney at Law, is a Minnesota divorce lawyer. Call (952) 491-0390 or send an email to liz@chermacklaw.com  to schedule a consultation with Elizabeth Rosar Chermack, Attorney at Law. ATTORNEY ADVERTISING MATERIAL. The content of this website is for informational purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No attorney/client relationship is formed by use of this website. Do not submit confidential information via this site unless and until there is a signed retainer contract on file.

What if you can’t reach a divorce agreement? Read More »

Divorced –  without having to go to Court

I offer an affordable flat fee rate for couples who are divorcing in Minnesota and who have reached agreement on all issues in their divorce case. I also offer a similar flat fee rate in uncontested custody cases. A lot of people wonder if they have to go to Court in order to get divorced. The answer is “not always.” In certain cases, parties can submit a Stipulation and proposed Judgment and Decree to the Court and get divorced without ever having to step foot into a courtroom (or a Zoom courtroom). See Minn. Stat. § 518.13, subd. 5. If you want to find out if you could get divorced without having to go to court, call (952) 491-0390 or send an email to liz@chermacklaw.com  to schedule a consultation with Elizabeth Rosar Chermack, Attorney at Law. ATTORNEY ADVERTISING MATERIAL. The content of this website is for informational purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No attorney/client relationship is formed by use of this website. Do not submit confidential information via this site unless and until there is a signed retainer contract on file.

Divorced –  without having to go to Court Read More »

Antenuptial Agreements in Minnesota

It is not uncommon for couples who are contemplating marriage to enter into an Antenuptial Agreement (commonly referred to as a “prenup” or a “prenuptial agreement”). Minnesota law allows parties to enter into an antenuptial agreement. If a party is considering entering into an antenuptial agreement, the parties should each consult with an attorney as far in advance of the wedding as possible. Additionally, both parties should be represented by attorneys who are experienced in both family law AND drafting and reviewing antenuptial agreements. In order for a Minnesota antenuptial agreement to be enforceable, the agreement must be procedurally and substantively fair. Procedural fairness. Minn. Stat. §519.11 provides requirements that must be met in order for an antenuptial agreement to be enforceable. These requirements include a full disclosure of income and assets by both parties and that both parties have an opportunity to consult with an attorney. Minn. Stat. §519.11 contains additional requirements to those listed in the previous sentence, to ensure procedural fairness. Substantive fairness. The parties won’t know if their antenuptial agreement will be upheld by a court until and unless they ultimately end up divorcing. McKee-Johnson v. Johnson sets out a two-pronged test to determine whether an antenuptial agreement is enforceable: Elizabeth Rosar Chermack is a Family Law attorney who lives in Apple Valley, Minnesota, and can assist you with your Antenuptial Agreement. Call (952) 491-0390 or send an email to liz@chermacklaw.com to schedule a consultation with Liz. ATTORNEY ADVERTISING MATERIAL. The content of this website is for informational purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No attorney/client relationship is formed by use of this website. Do not submit confidential information via this site unless and until there is a signed retainer contract on file.

Antenuptial Agreements in Minnesota Read More »

calculator, calculation, insurance-1680905.jpg

Property division in a Minnesota divorce

When a married couple is divorcing in Minnesota, their divorce decree must resolve the issue of property division. All assets and debts of the parties must be divided between the parties. Minnesota law requires that there be a “just and equitable division” of the parties’ marital property. In addition to determining the values of the parties’ marital property and determining what a “just and equitable division” of said property looks like, the following needs to be considered: Is there any nonmarital property? How is the value of that nonmarital property calculated? Will any nonmarital property be awarded to the other spouse in order to prevent “unfair hardship”? What is the valuation date? Minnesota law states the following in regards to the valuation date: “The court shall value marital assets for purposes of division between the parties as of the day of the initially scheduled prehearing settlement conference, unless a different date is agreed upon by the parties, or unless the court makes specific findings that another date of valuation is fair and equitable. If there is a substantial change in value of an asset between the date of valuation and the final distribution, the court may adjust the valuation of that asset as necessary to effect an equitable distribution.” In order to determine whether a proposed division of marital property is “just and equitable,” the parties need to make full disclosure of their assets and debts to one other. When one party is not being cooperative or honest, it becomes difficult to easily reach a “just and equitable” property settlement. Elizabeth Rosar Chermack is a lawyer with an office in Dakota County, and can represent you in your divorce.  Call (952) 491-0390 or send an email to liz@chermacklaw.com to schedule a consultation with Liz. ATTORNEY ADVERTISING MATERIAL. The content of this website is for informational purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No attorney/client relationship is formed by use of this website. Do not submit confidential information via this site unless and until there is a signed retainer contract on file.

Property division in a Minnesota divorce Read More »

law, lawyer, attorney-4617873.jpg

Initial Case Management Conference in Dakota County

In Dakota County (and many other counties in Minnesota), if you or your spouse have filed for divorce and opened a court file, but you have not yet reached agreement on all issues of your divorce, your first court date will likely be the Initial Case Management Conference (ICMC). You might be wondering what will happen at the ICMC. For a lot of people, it is their first time ever actually going to court, so it feels scary. Luckily, ICMC is not scary. You (or your attorney) will need to fill out the ICMC Data Sheet ahead of time, and will need to bring it to your ICMC along with any required documents (tax returns, paystubs, etc.). The main point of ICMC is to learn about different ways that your divorce can proceed. There are 2 different “tracks” by which your divorce can proceed: (1) the traditional litigation track; OR (2) the Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) process. Parties are strongly encouraged to participate in the ENE process. During the ENE process, the parties (and their lawyers) meet with an evaluator (or more than one evaluator) to resolve their financial and/or custody and parenting time issues. A large majority of cases settle during or as a result of ENE. Choosing to participate in ENE instead of initially choosing the traditional litigation track tends to be more cost-effective as well. Elizabeth Rosar Chermack is a Dakota County Family Law Attorney, and can represent you in your divorce or custody case.   Call (952) 491-0390 or send an email to liz@chermacklaw.com to schedule a consultation with her. ATTORNEY ADVERTISING MATERIAL. The content of this website is for informational purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No attorney/client relationship is formed by use of this website. Do not submit confidential information via this site unless and until there is a signed retainer contract on file.

Initial Case Management Conference in Dakota County Read More »

document, agreement, documents-428331.jpg

If my spouse & I agree on all the terms of our divorce, do I still need a lawyer?

Even if you and your spouse have reached an agreement on all the terms of your divorce, it is still important to consult with an attorney. On many occasions, I have consulted with someone who has reached an agreement with their spouse on many of the terms of their divorce, but they have forgotten about a couple of decisions that need to be made. An experienced attorney also has the ability to suggest specific language or wording to put into your divorce paperwork that will make things go more smoothly in the future. Unfortunately there have been times when people have decided not to consult with an attorney before getting divorced, and when they DIY-ed it, they left important things out of their paperwork. A year or two down the road, they find themselves in a dispute with their ex-spouse, and spending a lot of time, energy, and money on the post-decree dispute. Often the dispute could have been avoided if they had more carefully drafted their initial divorce paperwork. If you and your spouse are getting divorced in Minnesota, and you have reached an agreement on all areas of your divorce, you may be able to hire an attorney to represent you for a flat fee in an uncontested divorce. Elizabeth Rosar Chermack is a Minnesota Divorce Attorney, with an office in Burnsville, and can represent you in your divorce.  Call (952) 491-0390 or send an email to liz@chermacklaw.com to schedule a consultation with Liz. ATTORNEY ADVERTISING MATERIAL. The content of this website is for informational purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No attorney/client relationship is formed by use of this website. Do not submit confidential information via this site unless and until there is a signed retainer contract on file.

If my spouse & I agree on all the terms of our divorce, do I still need a lawyer? Read More »

calculator, calculation, insurance-1680905.jpg

How to resolve joint debts and protect yourself in a divorce

In a previous post, I discussed the unfortunate fact that your divorce decree will not change your contract with your creditors. In other words, if you and your ex-spouse were both jointly liable on a Visa credit card, the divorce decree saying that your ex-spouse is liable for the debt owed to Visa does not change the underlying contract with Visa, meaning: if your ex-spouse doesn’t pay Visa, Visa will very likely try to collect that debt from you.  Here are some possible solutions to remove a party from a joint account: 1) New account with the same creditor. Sometimes, by talking to the creditor first, you can get them to issue a new account with just the liable (according to the divorce decree) party’s name on it. Creditors may not always be willing to do this, as it is obviously beneficial to them to have both of the joint debtors on the hook for the debt. However, some people have had success with this tactic. 2) Refinancing the debt. Find a creditor who is willing to refinance the outstanding debt into the liable (according to the divorce decree) party’s name. Be cautious in choosing this option that the payment terms (interest rate, number of monthly payments, amount of payments, etc.) are doable and that they make sense for you. It wouldn’t make sense to refinance from a 2% APR to a 12% APR if you didn’t have to, right? 3) Paying off the debt using marital assets. If the divorcing parties have enough assets to do so, the parties might choose to pay off their marital debts using their marital assets. That way neither party has to worry about the other party failing to make a payment on a joint credit account. 4) Extreme cases only: bankruptcy. Sometimes a divorcing couple will have a crippling amount of debt and at that point, it may make sense for one or both parties to file bankruptcy. In deciding whether to file an individual or joint bankruptcy and in deciding in whether to file before or after the divorce is finalized, it is important to know your spouse AND it is important to consult with both your divorce attorney and with a bankruptcy attorney. Resolving joint debts is a common issue that comes up in a divorce. It is important to know your spouse and how reliable they are when it comes to paying their debts before agreeing to something that could negatively impact your financial future. Additionally, because some of the above options may not be available for all people, you will want to do research early on in your divorce. In other words, it doesn’t do any good to agree that each party will refinance the joint debts for which they are responsible (according to the divorce decree) into their own name if it turns out that neither party is actually able to do so due to having bad credit or due to lending practices at the time of the divorce. In order to resolve the joint debts in the way that makes the most sense and in a way that protects you, you need to know what options are available for you on each debt. Elizabeth Rosar Chermack is a Minnesota Divorce and Bankruptcy Attorney, and can represent you in your case.   Call (952) 491-0390 or send an email to liz@chermacklaw.com to schedule a consultation. ATTORNEY ADVERTISING MATERIAL. The content of this website is for informational purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No attorney/client relationship is formed by use of this website. Do not submit confidential information via this site unless and until there is a signed retainer contract on file. Elizabeth Rosar Chermack, Attorney at Law, is a debt relief agency helping people to file for bankruptcy relief under the bankruptcy code.

How to resolve joint debts and protect yourself in a divorce Read More »

What happens to joint debts in a divorce?

Often times, a divorcing couple will have several creditors to whom they owe money. For example, let’s say the divorcing couple has the following consumer debts: – Target credit card $1,000 – Chase credit card $3,000 – Capital One credit card $4,000 In this case, the divorcing couple has $8,000 worth of consumer debt. For simplicity’s sake, let’s assume that the couple agrees that all $8,000 of that debt is “marital debt”, and let’s assume that both spouses are on each of the credit card accounts as a joint debtor. During the divorce process, Spouse 1 agrees that they will pay the debt to Target and to Chase. Spouse 2 agrees that they will pay the debt to Capital One. Eventually (or maybe rather quickly) the divorcing couple comes to an agreement on all issues pertaining to their divorce, and they sign a Stipulation and their attorneys submit it to the Court. The Judge signs a Judgment and Decree or a Divorce Decree (or what people often call their “divorce papers”) that orders Spouse 1 to pay Target and Chase and Spouse 2 to pay Capital One. The question that people often ask me is: what happens to Spouse 1 if Spouse 2 does not pay? The answer is that unfortunately the Judgment and Decree  does not change the parties’ contract with the creditor. So, in this case, if Spouse 2 doesn’t make payments to Capital One, Capital One could still come after Spouse 1, even though the divorce decree says that Spouse 2 is obligated to pay. Additionally, Spouse 1’s credit score will likely be damaged by Spouse 2 not making payments to the creditor (Spouse 2’s credit score also won’t be looking good). Spouse 1 will still have recourse. Spouse 1 can sue Spouse 2 in family court for not following the Judgment and Decree. Unfortunately, by the time that issue comes in front of a Judge, the damage may very well have already been done to Spouse 1. Elizabeth Rosar Chermack is a Minnesota Divorce and Bankruptcy Attorney, and can represent you in your case.   Call (952) 491-0390 or send an email to liz@chermacklaw.com to schedule a consultation. ATTORNEY ADVERTISING MATERIAL. The content of this website is for informational purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No attorney/client relationship is formed by use of this website. Do not submit confidential information via this site unless and until there is a signed retainer contract on file. Elizabeth Rosar Chermack, Attorney at Law, is a debt relief agency helping people to file for bankruptcy relief under the bankruptcy code.

What happens to joint debts in a divorce? Read More »

How Does Bankruptcy Affect Divorce-Related Debts?

If you or your spouse may file bankruptcy after you divorce, it is important to know how bankruptcy affects some common issues in divorces. Prior to 2005, a debtor who was able to show an inability to pay for property settlement debts was able to have those debts discharged in a bankruptcy. This is no longer the case, and thus every type of obligation to a spouse, former spouse, or child of the debtor is non-dischargeable. See 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(5). See also 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(15). This means that child support obligations, spousal maintenance (alimony), and property settlements are generally non-dischargeable in bankruptcy. From a practical standpoint, though, one spouse may still be “on the hook” for a debt that the other spouse is obligated to pay under the property settlement of the divorce decree. If the debt is in both spouses’ names, but the husband is obligated to pay for it under the divorce decree, if the husband doesn’t pay it, the wife will still have to answer to the creditors. Thus, if the husband is not paying the debt that he is obligated to pay under the divorce decree, and it is negatively affecting the wife’s credit, the wife may either need to pay that debt herself or file bankruptcy in order to begin to rebuild her credit. The wife may also have a cause of action for contempt against her husband. Marital liens in real estate become property of the bankruptcy estate, because the bankruptcy code provides that “all legal or equitable interests of the debtor in property as of the commencement of the case” are property of the bankruptcy estate. See 11 U.S.C. §541(a)(1).  This means that the trustee in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy case will often try to sell the marital lien interest. These liens may be sold at a discount. Thus, the debtor may be able to buy it back from the trustee. In a Chapter 13 bankruptcy, a debtor must pay all amounts that he or she is required to pay under a domestic support obligation. Such obligations become due and payable after the petition is filed, and failure to make those payments is grounds for dismissal or conversion of the case. See 11 U.S.C. §1307(c)(11). In order for a Chapter 13 plan to be confirmed, a debtor’s plan must provide for full payment of domestic support payments. This is because domestic support payments are a priority claim. See 11 U.S.C. §507(a)(1)(B). A Chapter 13 plan that does not provide for full payment of this priority claim is only allowed “if the plan provides that all of the debtor’s projected disposable income for a 5-year period beginning on the date that the first payment is due under the plan will be applied to make payments under the plan.” See 11 U.S.C. §1322(a)(4). In conclusion, bankruptcy generally does not have a huge impact on divorce-related debts, because of the protections provided by the bankruptcy code for spouses, former spouses, and children of the debtor. Elizabeth Rosar Chermack is a Minnesota Bankruptcy Attorney and a Minnesota Divorce Lawyer, and can represent you in your bankruptcy or divorce matter. Call (952) 491-0390 or send an email to liz@chermacklaw.com to schedule a consultation with Liz. ATTORNEY ADVERTISING MATERIAL. The content of this website is for informational purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No attorney/client relationship is formed by use of this website. Do not submit confidential information via this site unless and until there is a signed retainer contract on file. Elizabeth Rosar Chermack, Attorney at Law, is a debt relief agency helping people to file for bankruptcy relief under the bankruptcy code.

How Does Bankruptcy Affect Divorce-Related Debts? Read More »

calculator, calculation, insurance-1680905.jpg

Minnesota Bankruptcy and Divorce: When to File Bankruptcy

If a divorcing couple decides that they need to file for bankruptcy, they have two more decisions to make: (1) Should they file before or after they divorce? (2) Should they file jointly? If the couple is filing for Chapter 7 bankruptcy and their debts are joint debts, it usually makes sense from a financial and emotional perspective to file jointly before they divorce. Why does it make sense from a financial perspective? Attorney Fees. The couple can hire one attorney to represent them in their joint bankruptcy case. Typically, bankruptcy attorneys charge less for a joint Chapter 7 bankruptcy case than they charge for two separate individual Chapter 7 cases. Filing Fee. A married couple filing a joint Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition will only have to pay for one court filing fee. If the two parties filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy separately, they would each have to pay the court filing fee. Divorce legal fees. If the parties have filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy jointly before beginning to work with their divorce attorneys, the parties will have less to decide (and argue about) during the divorce process. If the parties have accumulated a large amount of debt together, then that debt will have to be dealt with during the divorce process.  This generally results in higher legal fees. Means Test. In order to file for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, the party or parties must satisfy the means test. The means test is based on the party’s income. In order to pass the means test, the debtor’s income must be below the median income for the debtor’s household in the debtor’s state. If the parties file a joint bankruptcy petition before they divorce, it may be easier for them to satisfy the means test and be able to file for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, even though one of the parties may not have been able to satisfy the means test on their own. Property Exemptions. The parties will be able to exempt more property if they file jointly than if they file separately. Eliminating the problem of collection and contempt actions. Bankruptcy law does not allow a divorcee to discharge debts ordered in the divorce, but one problem that commonly comes up is a party’s failure to follow the divorce decree. For example, if the couple’s debts are marital debts, but they are only in one spouse’s name, the couple’s divorce decree will order the parties regarding the division of this debt. It is important to remember that this decree is valid and enforceable between the spouses and the divorce court. However, the divorce decree will not alter the parties’ contract with the creditor. Thus, if the debts are in the husband’s name, but the wife is ordered to pay part of these debts in the divorce decree, and the wife doesn’t pay her share, the husband is still “on the hook” with the creditor for those debts. The husband will be able to bring a contempt action against his ex-wife for her failure to comply with the divorce decree, but that will cost him money and take time. Also, if the ex-wife does not have the money to pay what she owes the creditor at that time, the husband’s credit will still be damaged and the creditor may take collection actions against him. Why does it make sense from an emotional perspective? Moving on with your life. Both divorce and bankruptcy are major life-altering events. If you are divorcing your spouse, and getting a “fresh start”, it might also be nice to have your debts discharged (if filing for bankruptcy makes sense in your situation). What are some of the downsides of filing Chapter 7 bankruptcy jointly before the divorce? The blame game. If issues arise during the bankruptcy process that may affect the outcome of the case (possible fraud, for example), the parties will likely play the “blame game” with each other. Individual needs. It may make sense for one spouse to use the state exemptions and the other spouse to use the federal exemptions. This cannot be done if the parties are filing a joint Chapter 7 bankruptcy. Cooperation and communication. People who are getting divorced are often doing so because the parties struggle with communication and are not able to cooperate. Filing a joint Chapter 7 bankruptcy requires the parties to cooperate with one another and to have good communication skills. Before a divorcing couple decides to file a joint Chapter 7 bankruptcy, they should evaluate their ability to act civilly towards one another. What about Chapter 13 bankruptcy? Generally, it is better for a divorcing couple to wait until after they divorce to file for Chapter 13 bankruptcy, and to file separately. Chapter 13 cases last a lot longer than Chapter 7 cases – they can last up to five (5) years. If the couple files jointly, then they will have to cooperate during that entire Chapter 13 case AND make joint payments. Elizabeth Rosar Chermack is a Minnesota Bankruptcy Attorney and Minnesota Divorce Attorney, and can represent you in your bankruptcy or divorce matter.  Call (952) 491-0390 or send an email to liz@chermacklaw.com to schedule a consultation with Liz. ATTORNEY ADVERTISING MATERIAL. The content of this website is for informational purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No attorney/client relationship is formed by use of this website. Do not submit confidential information via this site unless and until there is a signed retainer contract on file. Elizabeth Rosar Chermack, Attorney at Law, is a debt relief agency helping people to file for bankruptcy relief under the bankruptcy code.

Minnesota Bankruptcy and Divorce: When to File Bankruptcy Read More »

Scroll to Top